back to top
Thursday, February 20, 2025
HomeBlogCalifornia Succession 101

California Succession 101

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Table of Contents

Introduction

California has long been recognized for its economic power, cultural influence, and diverse geography. Over the years, discussions regarding the possibility of California becoming an independent entity have periodically emerged. These discussions occasionally intensify during certain political climates or following significant legislative actions at the federal level. While the prospect of California separating from the United States appears unlikely from legal and political perspectives, the subject continues to attract interest among policy observers and the general public.

This article provides an in-depth review of California’s potential path to secession by examining historical development, legal complexities, socioeconomic dynamics, and hypothetical outcomes. It offers a factual, objective perspective and outlines both theoretical and practical considerations. The content is structured in a way that is accessible to a nontechnical audience, with a focus on clarity and comprehensiveness.

By exploring the past, present, and potential future of secession dialogues, observers can gain a broader understanding of how constitutional interpretations, economic interdependencies, and interstate relationships might influence any secession attempt. This exploration underscores the importance of recognizing the interconnected nature of modern governance in the United States and highlights the multifaceted factors that would shape any secession plan.

Historical Context of Secession Movements

Early American History and Secession Precedents

The United States has a long history of debates over secession, which dates back to the earliest years of the nation’s formation. Before the U.S. Constitution was ratified, states held considerable authority, and there were times when groups suggested forming separate political entities. During the pre-Civil War era, secessionist movements surfaced in multiple parts of the country, most notably in the South. These movements culminated in the Civil War when 11 states seceded to form the Confederacy.

After the Civil War concluded in 1865, the federal government took measures to strengthen the Union and diminish the probability of future secessions. The Supreme Court case Texas v. White (1869) declared secession unconstitutional, stating that states do not have the legal authority to unilaterally withdraw from the Union. This legal precedent remains influential today. Although the Civil War and subsequent legal decisions made secession more difficult, some states or regions occasionally explore the idea for diverse political, cultural, or economic reasons.

Early Discussions Specific to California

California joined the United States in 1850 as part of the Compromise of 1850. Almost immediately, some political actors raised questions about splitting California into different states because of its geographic scale and disparities in population distribution. These discussions usually focused on the prospect of dividing the state, rather than California leaving the Union entirely.

Over time, certain regions within California have entertained the idea of forming new states. One example is the proposed “Jefferson” in the far northern counties. This proposal was often motivated by arguments that those counties were underserved by the state government, that they had different economic needs compared to urban centers, or that they desired distinct political representation. While these movements never progressed to the point of secession from the nation, they established a precedent for the concept of reorganizing California’s governance.

Modern Calls for California Independence

Though secession talk in California has surfaced intermittently for decades, it gained renewed attention around the early 21st century. Shifts in political climate, disagreements with federal policies, and philosophical debates over states’ rights fed these discussions. Some California-based organizations have proposed ballot measures to explore the viability of a referendum on independence.

While such proposals have rarely garnered serious legislative traction, they reflect an undercurrent of discontent or a desire for policy autonomy. These initiatives are more symbolic than practical, given the existing constitutional framework, yet they continue to spark fascination among observers. The notion that a state as large and economically prominent as California could exit the Union intrigues commentators and prompts explorations of potential legal and socioeconomic pathways.

The Constitution’s Stance on Secession

The U.S. Constitution does not explicitly address whether a state can unilaterally depart from the Union. During the Constitutional Convention and the early years of the Republic, the founders were focused on forging a stable federal structure, not discussing the mechanisms for states to withdraw.

The legal consensus following the Civil War is that unilateral secession is prohibited. Texas v. White (1869) provided a definitive statement of federal authority, clarifying that the Union is “indestructible” and that states do not have the authority to disassociate from the federal government on their own accord. The decision concluded that any changes to a state’s status must come through a process involving both state and federal action, which for most legal experts makes secession practically unachievable.

The Amendment Process

Some argue that if secession were to occur, it might involve a constitutional amendment. Article V of the U.S. Constitution outlines a process for amendments through either two-thirds votes of both houses of Congress and ratification by three-fourths of the states, or a constitutional convention called by two-thirds of the states. Either path would require a broad national consensus, and in a scenario centered around secession, achieving that level of agreement would be extraordinarily challenging.

Even if proponents of California secession attempted the amendment process, they would face obstacles in persuading a sufficient number of states to support allowing a region as influential as California to leave. Economic and geopolitical concerns, as well as the potential ramifications on national governance, would form a significant barrier.

International Law Considerations

Supporters sometimes point to concepts of self-determination in international law. However, the international legal framework generally supports a state’s internal self-determination if there is a history of oppression or a lack of political representation, conditions not applicable to California within the U.S. context. The external self-determination principle is more relevant to regions under colonial rule or experiencing severe human rights violations.

In California’s situation, there is no recognized international basis for unilaterally declaring independence. Even if a referendum passed within California, it would hold symbolic value unless the federal government cooperated. International entities generally recognize existing states and would likely be reluctant to override a country’s constitutional structure without clear justification.

Socioeconomic Dynamics of California

Economic Position

California is recognized as one of the largest subnational economies in the world. Its gross domestic product (GDP) surpasses that of numerous countries, making the state an economic powerhouse in technology, entertainment, agriculture, and other sectors. This leads some to propose that California could thrive independently, given its substantial tax base, innovation hubs, and global cultural influence.

However, the state also benefits from integration within the U.S. economy. Interstate trade is simplified through federal regulations and shared infrastructure. Defense contracts and federal research grants contribute significantly to California’s economy, as do tourism and nationwide partnerships in commerce. Moreover, certain federal agencies address disaster response, water resource management, and environmental oversight, areas where cooperative arrangements provide essential support.

Demographics and Cultural Complexity

California’s population is vast and culturally varied, encompassing urban centers like Los Angeles and San Francisco, agricultural regions in the Central Valley, and rural territories across mountainous and desert areas. This diverse makeup produces a range of political preferences and socioeconomic priorities. While some residents might advocate for secession based on perceived ideological differences with the rest of the country, others value the alignment with broader national policies, especially on issues such as environmental regulation and federal social programs.

A serious secession movement would have to navigate internal divisions within California’s own borders. Some coastal cities might hold progressive policy preferences, whereas inland regions often lean more conservative. Any attempt at independence would need to reconcile these competing perspectives, ensuring that collective governance structures would be robust enough to manage divergent policy needs.

Fiscal Structure and Federal Funding

While California contributes a significant amount in federal taxes, it also receives substantial federal funding in domains like infrastructure, education, and healthcare. A breakaway state would have to establish its own military, diplomatic corps, and social safety nets. The potential budgetary demands of forming an independent government would be vast, requiring decisions about taxation, currency adoption, and national-level financial oversight.

Some supporters of California’s potential independence argue that the state could redirect its federal tax outflows to boost state programs. Others counter that new expenditures on defense, international representation, and other federal services would overshadow any perceived savings. This fiscal complexity underscores the importance of a thorough analysis of the economic feasibility of independence.

Political Factors Influencing the Debate

Federal-State Tensions

Political tensions between federal and state governments have sometimes fueled secession discussions. When federal policies conflict with the policy preferences of California’s elected leadership or a significant portion of its electorate, calls for separation may intensify.

Examples include differences in environmental regulations, immigration policy, and healthcare legislation. California has often adopted stricter emission standards than federal requirements, drawing both legal challenges and support from those who see it as a leader in environmental stewardship. Similar disagreements have arisen over enforcement of immigration laws. These tensions, while significant, have not approached a point where mainstream decision-makers consider secession a viable path.

Partisan Landscape

California’s political climate often leans toward one major party. At the federal level, this can create friction when the opposite party holds power in the White House or in Congress. Some state officials have voiced dissatisfaction with federal policies, suggesting that California might be better off charting its own course.

At the same time, shifting voter demographics within California and across the nation could alter the intensity of these tensions over time. Political differences may continue to spark discussions about secession, but they have not led to any official steps toward breaking away from the Union.

Public Sentiment

Opinion polls on California’s separation have rarely shown broad support. While certain polls indicate that a portion of Californians harbor a desire for more autonomy, the idea of complete separation from the United States has generally failed to attract majority backing. Many residents still value national identity, shared defense, and federal economic partnerships.

If a notable event or crisis were to heighten public support for secession, it might shift the political calculus. Nonetheless, past data suggests that public sentiment remains a barrier to achieving any large-scale mobilization in favor of independence.

Development of Secession Plans Over Time

Grassroots Movements and Petitions

Secession dialogues often start at the grassroots level. Groups form coalitions, attempt to place measures on the ballot, and propose legislative actions. These entities typically present arguments that California has distinct cultural and policy preferences, as well as a robust economy that could flourish independently. They also highlight dissatisfaction with certain federal actions or policies they perceive as detrimental to the state.

Despite periodic bursts of enthusiasm, these grassroots efforts have not advanced beyond initial stages. Ballot initiatives have been introduced in small numbers, but they rarely move forward to a full vote. Legislative support within California’s State Assembly or Senate has been limited, reflecting a broader reluctance to engage with a concept that many view as legally unviable.

Lobbying and Organizational Efforts

Some secession-minded organizations have attempted to lobby both state and national lawmakers. They strive to build alliances around the notion that California’s unique demographic and economic profile warrants consideration of a distinct national identity. Their advocacy sometimes includes events, conferences, or media campaigns to raise awareness about perceived federal overreach or underrepresentation.

In periods of heightened political division, these organizations occasionally garner attention from national media outlets. Such coverage can spark debate among commentators who wonder if the concept of a “Calexit” will evolve beyond political discourse. Yet even at times of national polarization, the overwhelming consensus among political leaders is that formal secession would trigger complex legal battles and fiscal uncertainties.

Incremental Autonomy vs. Full Independence

Another angle of development focuses on achieving incremental autonomy within the existing constitutional system. Instead of pursuing outright independence, some Californians advocate for expanded state-level authority over issues like taxation, healthcare, environmental policy, and education. This approach seeks to remain within the framework of the Union but asks for greater flexibility in policymaking.

While this strategy stops short of complete separation, it does reflect an underlying desire for self-determination in key policy areas. If the federal government were to grant more power to states, some might view it as a pathway toward functional independence without the difficulties of full secession. However, any significant shift in the federal-state balance of power typically requires legislative or judicial action at the national level.

Scenario 1: Unilateral Declaration

In a unilateral declaration, California’s government would declare that it no longer recognizes federal authority. This approach carries immense legal and practical obstacles. Under U.S. law, this act would likely be invalid, and the federal government would respond through legal channels to maintain sovereignty.

The immediate consequences could include federal injunctions, potential deployment of federal agencies, and severe economic disruption. Financial markets might react negatively, as the stability of existing contracts, trade agreements, and obligations come under question. Public services and interstate commerce would face significant uncertainty.

Given the legal precedent set by Texas v. White, a unilateral declaration would be effectively unenforceable unless the federal government recognized the action. Recognition at the national and international levels would likely be minimal, rendering the effort unsuccessful.

Scenario 2: Constitutional Amendment

A more theoretically viable route would involve amending the U.S. Constitution to allow California to leave the Union. The process could begin with proposals in Congress or calls for a constitutional convention. In either situation, approval by two-thirds of both houses of Congress or two-thirds of state legislatures would be needed to propose the amendment, and ratification by three-fourths of the states would be required to finalize it.

Achieving this level of consensus is exceedingly rare, especially for a question of national division. The complexities of national defense, foreign policy, interstate resource sharing, and economic integration would all come to the forefront. Competing interests among the remaining states would likely halt the process. Supporters would face a monumental political challenge in persuading such a large portion of the American public and state governments to agree to California’s departure.

Scenario 3: Negotiated Separation Agreement

This scenario envisions a situation in which California and the federal government negotiate a formal agreement, akin to a treaty, that outlines the terms of separation. These terms could include division of assets and liabilities, currency arrangements, defense responsibilities, and transitional governance structures.

Even if policymakers in California managed to generate support for a negotiated separation, the federal government would have to concur. Congress would need to pass legislation permitting the state to leave. Such an approach is similar to how countries might handle dissolving a union, but the U.S. Constitution does not provide a direct mechanism for this. The lack of an established procedure makes this scenario improbable, though it is theoretically more coherent than an outright unilateral declaration.

Scenario 4: Judicial Interpretation Shift

A fourth scenario posits a drastic shift in the judicial interpretation of federal power and state rights. If a newly constituted Supreme Court overturned Texas v. White, it could open a legal path for states to depart. Such a ruling would represent a radical departure from long-standing precedent.

The political and social reactions to such a ruling would be profound. States across the nation might reevaluate their relationship with the federal government, potentially leading to unrest or the emergence of other secession efforts. The federal government’s legislative and executive branches would almost certainly respond with constitutional amendments or additional statutory measures to restore the prior understanding of federal unity.

Given the entrenched legal precedent and the broad consensus regarding the permanence of the Union, this scenario is deemed extremely unlikely.

“Impossible” Outcomes and Potential Impact

Federal Non-Intervention

One hypothetical outcome is that the federal government would simply allow California to leave without significant opposition. In this scenario, both Congress and the Executive Branch would decide not to enforce unity. This possibility remains extremely remote because of the legal, economic, and military implications. The federal government has a constitutional responsibility to maintain the Union, and leadership is unlikely to relinquish that responsibility for a state as significant as California.

Widespread Global Recognition

Another unlikely outcome is that countries around the world would quickly recognize California as an independent nation, overriding the federal government’s constitutional framework. This would challenge the standard practices of international diplomacy, which typically favor established sovereign states. Without the endorsement of the U.S. government, California’s recognition as an independent entity would be tenuous at best, making this scenario improbable.

Seamless Economic Transition

Some might envision a smooth transition where California adopts a currency, establishes independent international trade agreements, and reconfigures its administrative framework with little disruption. In reality, any separation would involve complex negotiations over debt, currency policies, and trade regulations. Federal agencies currently manage highways, energy grids, and telecommunications infrastructure that crisscross state lines. Shifting these responsibilities to a newly independent California would be far from seamless, requiring years of financial and logistical planning.

The idea of a perfectly smooth exit does not align with historical precedents. Even relatively peaceful separations elsewhere in the world have faced challenges related to finance, citizenship, and jurisdiction.

Zero Domestic Political Conflict

Some viewpoints suggest that a secession could occur without major internal strife within California. Yet, the reality is that secession would likely amplify tensions among Californians who prefer remaining in the Union. Certain regions might even attempt to remain part of the United States, triggering new disputes or efforts to form separate states within the territory. This fragmentation could produce internal conflicts that would need resolution through negotiation or legal proceedings.

Economic Consequences of a Hypothetical Secession

Currency and Monetary Policy

If California decided to secede, it would need to resolve questions about currency usage. Remaining with the U.S. dollar might require agreements with the federal government and acceptance of Federal Reserve policies, effectively ceding monetary decision-making to a foreign authority. Alternatively, launching a new currency would pose significant operational challenges, including establishing credibility in international markets and regulating financial institutions.

A separate currency could fluctuate dramatically in value, making international trade more uncertain. Investors might be reluctant to hold assets denominated in a new currency until it demonstrated stability. Large multinational firms based in California could face confusion over labor contracts, pricing structures, and tax obligations.

Trade and Business Implications

California’s economy is deeply interconnected with other states. Large technology companies rely on nationwide supply chains, agricultural products move across state lines, and entertainment ventures distribute films and media throughout the country. Independence might introduce tariffs, customs checks, and regulatory divergences that would complicate these exchanges.

Major companies could respond by relocating or splitting operations to maintain frictionless access to the broader U.S. market. Smaller businesses would be more exposed to changes in trade dynamics, as they may not have the resources to adapt to new regulations. This shift could lead to job losses in certain sectors, while potentially opening opportunities for new industries that cater to California-specific standards.

Federal Programs and Social Services

The federal government provides substantial resources for healthcare, social security, and financial assistance programs. In the event of secession, California would have to establish and fund its own versions of these programs. Initially, this would entail an enormous administrative and financial undertaking. While the state could attempt to replicate federal programs or design new systems, it might require higher taxes or reallocation of existing revenues, at least in the short term.

Retirees who rely on federal social security benefits, veterans who depend on federal healthcare, and low-income households that receive federal assistance would all face uncertainty. A newly independent California government would need to negotiate transitional arrangements so that those who have paid into federal systems might continue to receive benefits.

Possible Tax Implications

Secession advocates sometimes suggest that California could redirect funds currently sent to the federal government toward state services. Yet, the creation of new national institutions such as defense, border control, and diplomatic missions would increase public expenditures. The net effect on taxes remains speculative, as it would depend on the terms of any separation agreement and California’s policy decisions regarding budget priorities.

Political Ramifications Beyond California

Domino Effect on Other States

A successful secession by California, no matter how unlikely, could inspire other regions dissatisfied with federal policies to explore similar paths. States facing political, cultural, or economic disagreements with the federal government might be encouraged to initiate their own separation movements. This could result in a new era of fragmentation, weakening the political and economic cohesion of the United States.

However, the actual probability of a domino effect remains low. The legal and political challenges would be monumental, and the inherent difficulties of forging new nations within the boundaries of an established federal structure would deter most states from seriously pursuing separation.

Shift in the Balance of Power

Should California exit, the remaining U.S. states would lose a large number of congressional representatives, electoral votes, and tax revenue. This change would alter the political landscape at the federal level, potentially empowering regions with different policy priorities. Debates on issues like climate regulation, social welfare, and immigration would be reshaped by the absence of California’s influence.

Additionally, the Senate would see an adjustment in membership. While California’s two Senate seats would simply be removed, the power balance might shift in ways that favor states with smaller populations but greater proportional representation. Federal legislation could tilt toward perspectives less reflective of the historically influential California electorate.

International Relations for Both Entities

An independent California would need to develop its own diplomatic relationships, embassy networks, and participation in international organizations. Meanwhile, the remaining United States would adapt to a new foreign policy environment, with questions about defense alignments on the West Coast. Foreign nations might attempt to engage with California as a strategic or economic partner, though they would still maintain important ties with the rest of the United States.

Trade agreements involving California would have to be renegotiated, and the presence of major ports in areas such as Los Angeles or the San Francisco Bay could become leverage points in international commerce. The remainder of the United States would also have to navigate potential adjustments to shipping routes, military installations, and travel regulations.

Cultural and Social Dimensions

Identity and Nationhood

California’s cultural identity includes a strong tradition of innovation, entertainment, and progressive policy experimentation. Supporters of independence argue that this distinct culture merits a separate national identity. Detractors note that California’s diversity makes a single cultural narrative difficult to define. Any move toward secession would encounter competing perspectives on what it means to be a Californian, an American, or both.

Reconciling these identities would require leadership capable of uniting people behind a shared vision. Some sub-regions might resist an overarching identity that does not reflect local cultures, prompting further internal debates about governance structures. Balancing unity with diversity would be an immediate challenge for any new nation seeking cohesive identity formation.

Social Cohesion During Transition

During a hypothetical secession, social cohesion could fray as different groups realign their priorities. Complex matters such as citizenship status, voting rights, and eligibility for national programs would need resolution. Disputes might occur between communities in favor of remaining part of the United States and those supporting separation.

Leaders would have to implement transitional policies to maintain order, protect minority rights, and ensure continuity in public services. Civil disagreements could rise if certain populations felt disenfranchised by the shift in government structures or if they believed secession was executed without adequate representation.

Educational and Scientific Collaboration

California’s universities, research centers, and technology firms rely on federal grants and partnerships that facilitate scientific advancement. Separation might impede the flow of federal funds for research and development, limiting collaboration with institutions in the rest of the country. Researchers and students could face new bureaucratic hurdles when crossing borders, applying for grants, or sharing intellectual property.

Nevertheless, California’s innovative environment might remain attractive to private investors, global companies, and philanthropic institutions. A newly independent state could decide to fund higher education and research aggressively to compensate for reduced federal involvement. Whether such efforts could match or surpass existing federal programs would be uncertain.

Potential Pathways if Secession Moved Forward

Transition Plan

If California’s leadership somehow secured the political support to move forward, they would need a detailed transition plan addressing government structure, defense, currency, regulatory alignment, and international diplomacy. Formulating this plan would involve collaboration with stakeholders from different regions of California, as well as negotiations with federal representatives.

Establishing frameworks for immigration control between California and other U.S. states would be pressing, given the free movement of workers and goods that currently defines interstate commerce. A transitional period might last many years, during which existing federal agencies and California’s new institutions would coordinate to minimize disruptions.

Diplomatic Engagement

Assuming an independent California wanted recognition on the global stage, it would undertake significant diplomatic engagement. Embassies or consular offices would need to be established in key trading partners. California might also apply for membership in organizations like the United Nations, though the acceptance process could be complex, as it typically requires backing from existing member states.

A pressing question would involve defense alliances. An independent California might choose to form treaties with the United States or with North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) partners. Alternatively, it might develop a nonaligned stance, which could be challenging given its large population and strategic importance.

Domestic Policy Reorganization

California would face decisions on restructuring its legislative system, potentially revisiting how to represent regions and counties in a national assembly or parliament. The process might include balancing the needs of urban centers with those of rural communities. Healthcare, education, taxation, and social services would undergo reevaluation.

Some might see independence as an opportunity to reimagine policy in areas such as environmental stewardship, technological innovation, and social welfare. This reorganization would require extensive legislative sessions, public referendums, and transitional frameworks so that residents could adapt to new laws.

Challenges of Maintaining Unity Within California

If California managed to secede, regions such as the northern counties or parts of the Central Valley might advocate for their own break from the newly formed nation. This would introduce additional fragmentation risks. A stable, newly independent government would have to address local autonomy demands through measures such as decentralization or federalism at the subnational level.

By offering inclusive governance that respects regional differences, California’s leadership could reduce internal pressures that might otherwise undermine national unity. Nonetheless, these pressures could become more pronounced during the uncertainties of the early years of independence.

Summary

The prospect of California becoming an independent nation remains complex from legal, economic, and social perspectives. Historically, secession in the United States has been deemed unconstitutional, and any modern-day movement faces formidable legal barriers rooted in Supreme Court precedent. Although some California-based groups periodically propose independence, serious institutional support has been limited, reflecting the likelihood that the costs and disruptions would far outweigh any perceived advantages.

Yet the topic persists in public discourse because of California’s demographic size, economic influence, and distinct policy preferences. Speculative discussions explore multiple scenarios, ranging from unilateral declarations to negotiated agreements, none of which have demonstrated realistic pathways within the current legal framework. Even in hypothetical contexts, the impact on infrastructure, social services, and trade relations would be immense, with no guarantee of a smooth transition.

While “impossible” outcomes—such as global recognition without federal approval—remain theoretically conceivable in an abstract sense, they do not align with the established rules of international diplomacy or United States constitutional law. The substantial interconnections between California and the rest of the country act as a disincentive for separation and reinforce the state’s ongoing ties to national governance. In these conditions, the most probable outcome is that the discussions around California secession will continue to serve as a platform for broader debates on states’ rights, federal authority, and regional autonomy, rather than an actual path to independence.

SaleBestseller No. 1
Fodor's California: with the Best Road Trips (Full-color Travel Guide)
Fodor’s California: with the Best Road Trips (Full-color Travel Guide)
Fodor’s Travel Guides (Author); English (Publication Language); 896 Pages – 03/19/2024 (Publication Date) – Fodor’s Travel (Publisher)
$25.99 −$4.68 $21.31 Amazon Prime
SaleBestseller No. 2
Los Angeles, Portrait of a City
Los Angeles, Portrait of a City
Height: 13.75in / 35cm, Depth: 2in / 5cm, Width: 10.25in / 26cm; By Kevin Starr; Hardcover
$70.00 −$22.48 $47.52 Amazon Prime
SaleBestseller No. 3
Good Night California
Good Night California
New; Mint Condition; Dispatch same day for order received before 12 noon; Guaranteed packaging
$9.95 −$1.31 $8.64 Amazon Prime
SaleBestseller No. 4
Coastal California: The Pacific Coast Highway and Beyond
Coastal California: The Pacific Coast Highway and Beyond
Hardcover Book; Rajs, Jake (Author); English (Publication Language); 256 Pages – 10/24/2017 (Publication Date) – Rizzoli (Publisher)
$50.00 −$20.71 $29.29 Amazon Prime
Bestseller No. 5
California Bucket List: Set Off on 120 Epic Adventures and Discover Incredible Destinations to Live Out Your Dreams While Creating Unforgettable Memories that Will Last a Lifetime (Map Included)
California Bucket List: Set Off on 120 Epic Adventures and Discover Incredible Destinations to Live Out Your Dreams While Creating Unforgettable Memories that Will Last a Lifetime (Map Included)
Travel, BeCrePress (Author); English (Publication Language); 113 Pages – 08/13/2024 (Publication Date) – Independently published (Publisher)
$16.90 Amazon Prime
SaleBestseller No. 6
California: A History (Modern Library Chronicles)
California: A History (Modern Library Chronicles)
Starr, Kevin (Author); English (Publication Language); 416 Pages – 03/13/2007 (Publication Date) – Modern Library (Publisher)
$22.00 −$3.09 $18.91 Amazon Prime
SaleBestseller No. 7
I Survived the California Wildfires, 2018 (I Survived #20) (20)
I Survived the California Wildfires, 2018 (I Survived #20) (20)
Tarshis, Lauren (Author); English (Publication Language); 144 Pages – 09/01/2020 (Publication Date) – Scholastic Inc. (Publisher)
$5.99 −$1.90 $4.09 Amazon Prime
SaleBestseller No. 8
Only in California: Weird and Wonderful Facts About The Golden State (Volume 1) (Americana, 1)
Only in California: Weird and Wonderful Facts About The Golden State (Volume 1) (Americana, 1)
Hardcover Book; Alexander, Heather (Author); English (Publication Language); 64 Pages – 08/02/2022 (Publication Date) – Wide Eyed Editions (Publisher)
$21.99 −$7.68 $14.31 Amazon Prime
SaleBestseller No. 9
Birds of California Field Guide (Bird Identification Guides)
Birds of California Field Guide (Bird Identification Guides)
Tekiela, Stan (Author); English (Publication Language); 448 Pages – 04/05/2022 (Publication Date) – Adventure Publications (Publisher)
$18.95 −$4.46 $14.49 Amazon Prime
SaleBestseller No. 10
The California Kid: From USC Golden Boy to International Drug Kingpin
The California Kid: From USC Golden Boy to International Drug Kingpin
Hanson, Owen (Author); English (Publication Language); 256 Pages – 11/26/2024 (Publication Date) – Turner (Publisher)
$17.99 −$1.26 $16.73 Amazon Prime

Last update on 2025-02-20 / Affiliate links / Images from Amazon Product Advertising API

RELATED ARTICLES

Books

Games

Gift Ideas